Re: White Pine CUSeeMe Version 3.1.1

Scott Lacroix (
Tue, 21 Apr 1998 11:40:16 -0300

At 10:37 PM 4/20/98 -0500, Jason Williams wrote:
>I believe Cornell is required to send any changes they make to White Pine,
>so I'm not quite sure why White Pine didn't include it. I figure if the
>Cornell version is doing it, the White Pine version wouldn't want to break
>backwards compatibility. Who knows :)

What do you base that on? You're probably right BTW, as far as protocol
changes go. I'd just be ineterested in how you came to that conclusion...
But again, we're not talking about a protocol issue here.

- Scott


,-==================================-.-==================================-. | I haven't lost my mind, it's backed | Scott LaCroix ( | | up on tape around here somewhere... | Sr. Software Engineer ___ | | - Author Unknown | White Pine Software ./_ -\. | | #include<disclaimer/std.h> | q| o O |p | `-==================================-^-=====================oOOo=~U~=oOOo-'