Re: Surviellance/Monitoring

William Whalen (
Tue, 13 Aug 1996 17:05:16 -0400

This may be none of my buisness but here it goes. I would tend to
agree with Mr. Kitzmann. Let's not get off the track of the main question.
I don't believe it is necessary to go into the morality of the issue at
hand. I think just a simple answer whether the system would work or not
would suffice. How he is going to use the system is his buisness. I would
assume that he owns the system and would be allowed to use the system as he
chooses within legal limits.

From: William G. Whalen <>
Date: Tuesday, August 13, 1996 5:05 PM
From: Trevor A. Kitzmann <>
Subject: RE: Surviellance/Monitoring
Date: Tuesday, August 13, 1996 2:50 PM

Nancy, maybe you don't understand the term Surveilance. You know like when
you go to a store and they use cameras to protect their product? Well, the
same thing applies here. I think he meant for monitoring for the
deterrence of theft.

From: Nancy Ketring[]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 1996 11:28 AM
Subject: Re: Surviellance/Monitoring

I don't think CU-SeeMe was intended as a surveillance tool. If by
surveillance you mean spying on people. To me that seems an invasion of
privacy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I would hope this software would be used for
benefit of people and not the benefit of snoops!!

Nancy Ketring

At 09:13 AM 8/13/96 EDT, you wrote:
>Seems to me that CU-SeeMe would be ideal as a tool for internal
>surveillance or monitoring, since it is cheap and can run over a
>regular old LAN just fine. You don't even need expensive capture
>hardware. Is anyone out there doing this? If so, I'd like to hear from
>Andy Covell