Re: IRQ for Parallel Port

Daniel W. Erskine (derskine@swbell.net)
Mon, 25 Aug 1997 17:33:11 -0500


Ken McFarlane wrote:
>
> Hi:
> I would prefer to use a second parallel port for QuickCam rather
> than use a switch. The problem is that IRQs 5 and 7 are already
> taken (sound card and printer port). Can cu-seeme work with
> IRQ 9 or 11?
> --
> Ken McFarlane (Norfolk State University and Jefferson Lab)
> JLab : 757 269 5844 Fax: 757 269 6273 Email: mcfarlan@jlab.org
> NSU : 757 683 9208 Fax: 757 683 8817
>
> --
> Ken McFarlane Email: mcfarlan@jlab.org

Greetings:
The QuickCAM does not acknowledge itself by IRQ, but does check
for an existing LPT port. If you have a I/O board with the option
for hi-IRQ configuration, you can assign either IRQ 9 or 11 to that
LPT port!

Hope this helps,
===============================================================
"SHUT UP, BRAIN!!! ...Or I'll STAB you with a Q-tip!
-Homer Simpson

Daniel W. Erskine mailto:derskine@swbell.net
mailto:netsup75@edwardjones.com
===============================================================