Re: Ready for ISDN

Richard Jones (rej@yacc.co.uk)
Wed, 8 Feb 1995 04:23:58 -0500




Hi

We're using ISDN here (64k) and using the PC version, so no sound yet
(any idea when?). A couple of days ago I was getting 17 fps, but
yesterday it was pretty poor, down to about 2 or 3 (from the oslo
reflectors, a bit higher from NASA TV). So it all depends on what is
happeneing on the internet that day. But performance could be pretty
high. SHould be better than dial-up, in theory :-)




Richard Jones
(rej@yacc.co.uk)
YACC Labs
Leeds
UK

______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Ready for ISDN
Author: coyle@interaccess.com at Internet
Date: 08/02/95 08:28

>From uknet!cornell.edu!owner-cu-seeme-l@yacc.co.uk
X-Envelope-From: uknet!cornell.edu!owner-cu-seeme-l@yacc.co.uk
Received: from uknet.UUCP (root@localhost) by fido.yacc.co.uk (8.6.5/8.6.5) with
UUCP id IAA22060 for rej; Wed, 8 Feb 1995 08:22:56 GMT
Received: from LISTPROC.MAIL.CORNELL.EDU by eros.britain.eu.net via EUnet
with SMTP (PP) id <sg.07555-0@eros.britain.eu.net>;
Tue, 7 Feb 1995 19:07:59 +0000
Received: from localhost.mail.cornell.edu ([127.0.0.1])
by listproc.mail.cornell.edu with SMTP id <97039-6>;
Tue, 7 Feb 1995 13:06:59 -0500
Received: from cornell.edu ([132.236.56.6]) by listproc.mail.cornell.edu
with SMTP id <100979-1>; Tue, 7 Feb 1995 10:47:31 -0500
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by cornell.edu (8.6.9/8.6.9) id KAA29535
for CU-SEEME-L@listproc.mail.cornell.edu;
Tue, 7 Feb 1995 10:44:37 -0500
Received: from home.interaccess.com (home.interaccess.com [198.80.0.2])
by cornell.edu (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA29515
for <CU-SEEME-L@cornell.edu>; Tue, 7 Feb 1995 10:44:34 -0500
Received: from [198.80.71.106] (nwchi-d117.net.interaccess.com [198.80.71.117])
by home.interaccess.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id JAA15329
for <CU-SEEME-L@cornell.edu>; Tue, 7 Feb 1995 09:44:41 -0600
Message-Id: <v01510103ab5d34465fb6@[198.80.71.106]>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 1995 10:49:01 -0500
Reply-To: coyle@interaccess.com
Sender: owner-CU-SEEME-L@cornell.edu
From: coyle@interaccess.com (Michael Coyle)
To: CU-SEEME-L <CU-SEEME-L@cornell.edu>
Subject: Ready for ISDN
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-PH: V4.1@cornell.edu (Cornell Modified)
X-Listprocessor-Version: 7.1 -- ListProcessor by CREN

Hello All,

I'm about ready to make to make the move to ISDN. Right now, with a 28.8
v34, the performance I get with CU-SM is marginal at best. (Believe me, I
understand the creators did not have dial up modems in mind when they
created this cool product.)

My question is: What kind of performance can I expect with an ISDN (2 B
channel) connection? Will 32k audio work? Will 16k audio work?

I know this next question was discussed here before, but my limited brain
bandwith didn't 'get it'.

If a viewer connects to a reflector at 28.8k, will he drag down the
performance of other ISDN connections. For example, a good Bolo game can
be ruined when a 9600 baud modem joins. Does CU-SM fall to the lowest
bandwith demoninator?

CU-Later,
Michael

*************************************
*...........Michael.Coyle.............Audio.Engineer...........*
*......Chicago.Recording.Company - Studio 37......*
*.....................Check out my Web page.........................*
*..http://www.interaccess.com/users/coyle/..*
*************************************