Re: sound or no sound?

The mad Scientist! (
Fri, 9 Feb 1996 15:58:07 +1000 (GMT+1000)

On Thu, 8 Feb 1996, marshall katz wrote:

> The beta 2 version of CUSM from White Pine has good audio 1/1 and
> fair audio 1/many on a busy reflector. The audio in the Cornell
> version is not audible.

What's this about the audio in the Cornell version not being audible?
What exactly do you mean? Why is it not audible? When will it be fixed?

BTW, congratulations on a good product, and on your efforts. Keep up the
good work.