That frustration is compounded by the fact that there hasn't been a lot of
info, at least on this list, about workable, reasonably priced, and currently
available alternatives, nor on what boards will be tested/supported in future
PC/Windows releases of CU-SeeMe (should I be following a different list for
this info, though ?).
That's no reflection on the CU-SeeMe development team, though, who I feel are
doing excellent, breakthrough, and benevolent work. I know of no other effort
in this space that is doing more to bring desktop videoconferencing to the
masses than CU-SeeMe.
So, to turn Mr. Collins wording around, somebody please DO tease me with
information about capture hardware to be supported/tested for the next release
of PC/Windows CU-SeeMe, and about the capture hardware options besides
the Spigot and FS200 boards that are generally known to work (well) with
CU-SeeMe on the PC/Windows platform. Is there a definitive list somewhere ?
I'd rather be teased than frustrated :-)
John Faherty