Re: Fps with Connectix grey scale cam

Jason Williams (streak@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu)
Sun, 11 Jan 1998 13:20:20 -0600 (CST)


On Sat, 10 Jan 1998, Mark L. Bardenwerper, Sr. wrote:
> Oh, I wouldn't go that far! I'd say that with the Quickcam, the rates this guy
> is getting is optimum. Without changing anything but the capture device (B&W
> Quick to Haup. and vid. cam. I at least doubled my FPS, sometimes even more.
> And the picture is much more sharp and controllable (such as zoom).

I guess I'm just skeptical.. ANYONE can get about 7-10fps if they just
show a static image...and MJPEG doesn't work with frame differencing...so
it's not governed by the same principles.. (of course, you can get an
extremely high frame rate with a quality of 1% :))

--
streak@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu    * Jason Williams -- Austin, Tx.  |     |
streak@mail.utexas.edu       * University of Texas at Austin  | ___ |
streak@cs.utexas.edu         * BS Computer Science             \_|_/
*************** http://ccwf.cc.utexas.edu/~streak/ **************|