Re: Banned user....

Joel K. Southwick (
Sun, 16 Jul 1995 15:10:52 -0600 (MDT)

Well I think this post speaks for itself. Have we abandoned intelligent
discussion about CUCM or is it all about paranoia and pc vs. mac
diatribes? Just wondering because I have much better things to do than
wade through this.

On Sun, 16 Jul 1995 wrote:

> > I am not sure if the 'ban' is going to matter.
> Nope he/ she (p=0.0001%) will find another reflector
> > If the user is using
> > an IP pool, the address is going to change the net time he dials in.
> > Maybe restrice numbers from 204.31.246.*
> >>
> >>I have banned the following user ( from our reflector site
> >>and have sent a message to other Australian reflectors about this users
> >>lewd conduct. As a public site the quickest way to get us shut down is
> >>when some one decides to fondle themselves for the masses. Perhaps this
> >>message can help the user set up their own private refelector. Interesting
> >>as the person must have a following as with about 60 seconds there were
> >>about 10 connection from Lurkers...
> I occasionally fondle my nose ? Am I banned now too ?
> The more banning the more lurkers.
> So for arabian reflectors bann all female faces.
> For ancient chinese reflectors bann all showing of ankles.
> For intel reflectors DO NOT SHOW a Motorola PowerPC chip
> OK which public reflector can do a detection of this all ;)
> Where can I get a final method to check if someone is over 18 ?
> I am not that anarchistic not to see a problem here if I empathise with the
> paranoia schiso part of the human race; they are apparently conceived with
> a bag over the heads and the lights out.
> We could agree upon a conference number 6666 (to stay inline with the
> spirit of banners) that has a moderator, something like with IRC . You are
> first checked visualy by the moderator to see if you are over 18. Or
> another nifty scheme augmented by a new reflector feature. Hmm... if you
> are checked all to be under 18 is allright too because banners are over 18
> , ...haha.
> I am so interested in this discussion as I would be at the time of
> Copernicus and the RC banners. He must have turned 360 degrees but not
> around, like to smoke pot and not inhale .
> To all Lurkers please have a Hail Mary at hand and cut&paste it to this
> List. Or watch the screen with one eye as you will be stricken with
> blindness , you have at least one eye left.
> Please do not use the word CUT , in my language it means that I will be
> blind and I have to type now without seeing wat keetters U gut.snaafer
> twattihalli so as for ater poepli. Bye
> --
> Ko Stoel
> Amersfoort
> Holland