Bernard Varaine (
Tue, 4 Jun 1996 13:07:17 +1200 (GMT+1200)

As Parents, should not we have a look at what our 10Yo do on its own on
the net ?
otherwise I agree on keeping public ref, without CUsex
just my 10 cts.

On Sun, 2 Jun 1996, Bill Woodland wrote:

> >Date: Sun, 2 Jun 1996 09:57:29 -0500
> >Reply-To:
> >Sender:
> >From: "ryan o. kaplan" <>
> >To: <>
> >Subject: nudity
> >X-Sender:
> >X-PH: (Cornell Modified)
> >X-Listprocessor-Version: 7.2(a) -- ListProcessor by CREN
> >
> >>No nudity on PUBLIC reflectors, please. There are children out there! If
> >>the conference number is ZERO, then it's a PUBLIC reflector.
> >
> >what up with all the sensitivity about nudity, [even though it can be
> >disgusting]? are there really young ones out there? I have yet to see
> >*any* kids on a cuseeme reflector. (but I don't spend my whole life
> >cuseemeing, so maybe I'm wrong). any guess as to WHAT PERCENTAGE of
> >cuseeme'ers are MINORS? long live cuseeme.
> >
> I've seen them. There is a young girl from Alaska that does CU a lot, and I
> even saw a 10 year old girl on Freevue the other day. I thought it was odd,
> what with all of the sexual names on the userlist like "Male wants to see
> your___" and stuff like that.
> There aren't necessarily so many young people out there, but keeping netsex
> off of public reflectors is just the responsible thing to do.
> Bill Woodland (
> Squeek on Undernet IRC
> Channel Manager #CU-SeeMe
> PC only, no MAC questions, please.