Re: PC CUSeeMe: video capture board, which one?

Bennett Frankel (drbf@cais.cais.com)
Tue, 7 Mar 1995 15:40:06 -0500 (EST)


I am using the FS200 video blaster and it works great.
Bennett

On Tue, 7 Mar 1995, Diane Ibaraki wrote:

> Hi,
> I'm new to this group. I got PC CU-SeeMe up and running in
> receive mode only. I now need to purchase the video capture board.
> Documentation lists Video Spigot for Windows and Video Blaster both from
> Creative Labs. Can I get some recommendations as to which one is
> better for CU-SeeMe? Pros and Cons.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Diane Ibaraki
> University of Hawaii
> High Energy Physics Group
> <diane@uhhepj.phys.hawaii.edu>
>