RE: Porn using Cu-Seeme

John W. Osborne (
Tue, 5 Mar 1996 18:39:59 +-1000

Interesting post (Bob's portion is what I am referring to).
Perhaps if one actually has to go and ASK for "offensive" ref IP's
then the "problem" isn't as widespread as some would like us to believe.


From: Bill Woodland[]
Sent: Tuesday, 5 March 1996 2:34
Subject: Re: Porn using Cu-Seeme

>Date: Sat, 02 Mar 1996 15:10:49 -0500
>From: (R.S. [Bob] Heuman)
>To: <>
>Subject: Porn using Cu-Seeme
>X-PH: (Cornell Modified)
>X-Listprocessor-Version: 7.2(a) -- ListProcessor by CREN
>Will all those complaining about the availability of 'porn' or nudity via
>Cu-Seeme reflectors be kind enough to provide specific addresses so that
>the rest of us can:
>a) view said proported to be offensive to some screens, and
>b) make up our own minds on whether or not to be offended, and
>c) determine for ourselves if this material offends OUR community
> standards.
>Otherwise we are left in the "dark" on this entire issue....
>Anyone then not interested in viewing this material can then know where not
>to go to be offended, if it is, indeed, offensive material.
>R.S. (Bob) Heuman Willowdale, ON. Canada
> <> or <>
> <> or <>
>An inquiring mind in an aging body... My opinions are my own... (I hope)
> Copyright retained as per Canadian and International law... <FWIW grin>
> Void where prohibited by law
> If this message is illegal where you are, do not read it.

Or at least we would all know where the sex sites are, if that's what we ARE
looking for! Yea, sure, Bob :-)

Bill Woodland (
Squeek on Undernet IRC
Channel Manager #CU-SeeMe