Re: Porn using Cu-Seeme -Reply

Mike Godwin (MGodwin@bdm.com)
Tue, 05 Mar 1996 09:47:29 -0500


I don't know about you all, but I have trouble finding ANY
working reflectors, let alone specialized ones.

Is there a reflector list somewhere???
Mike

>>> Jonathan Day <jonathan.day@umist.ac.uk> 03/05/96 03:26am
>>>
Mike Stubblefield wrote:
> > Well, it only had to be a matter of time before someone would
get offended that they would go
> to a reflector and see people showing each other their personal a

I'm not totally convinced that the person was asking for a site list
in order to complain at the content.

> If there are those out there that want to do the kinds of things
this article was complaining
> about on public reflectors and the reflector admins don't want to

If an admin feels that a public reflector should contain material
that is generally held to be reasonable, then good for them. Why
should people be made to feel second-class simply because they
don't want to see something they don't like? There are plenty of
specialist reflectors for those who want to see nudity. There is no
call to force public reflectors to close. There is room enough for
everyone.

> Bottom line: if you don't like nudity, don't get the books,
magazines, videos or cuseeme
> reflector sites that show it. The responsiblity has to lie with the
in

Agreed, but, /please/, if a reflector says that nudity isn't allowed,
respect that. There is room enough on the net for everyone.

> my two cents worth and someone who plays on the sex
reflectors quite often and has fun doing
> it - and is not disuaded or shamed or anything by a bunch of
sexua

Why should you have to feel shamed? These "socially illiterate"
computer nerds have created an environment in which there is
room for all. If you want to have sexual fun on sex reflectors, then
good for you. That is, after all, what they are there for. Insisting
that any public reflector is fair game, though, is pure selfishness.
You have plenty of space.
What do you need everyone elses for?