Better digital cam than Quickcam?

Dave Easton (davie@primenet.com)
Tue, 19 Mar 1996 12:53:14 -0700 (MST)


>
> Hi,
>
> I am interested in getting on CU-seeme with a camera. I do not like to
> deal with computer problems, so I am attracted to the quickcam since it
> "just plugs in" with no capture board. (I am using a 486 PC).
>
> I am wondering if there are any "digital" cameras that would also "plug
> in" that have a higher quality video than Quickcam?
>
> I realize Quickcam is great for the price and not that poorly matched to
> the capabilities of cu-seeme, but I do see better video from setups that
> use an expensive analog camera and a capture board. I even see this through
> reflectors. This is just a hobby, but I could spend more that the $95
> required for a quickcam. Thanks, Dave in Phoenix
>