You're both right in a sense, but (as always) the bandwidth paradigm
is shifting. The claim that "I _paid_ for that _continuous_ 28.8 kbps
connection" probably isn't what your Internet provider (ISP) had in
mind.
Typical, everyday apps are bursty, low bandwidth or asymmetric: Email,
terminal emulation, ftp, WWW, etc. You wind up using very little of a
dialup 28.8 kbps at any given long stretch of time. ISPs could
typically gamble with over-selling their net connection bandwidth by
50 to 100 fold.
Now that CUSeeMe or RealAudio streams are going to be so demanding,
the same economic and bandwidth-overselling model doesn't hold. ISPs
never had these two-way streaming applications in mind, so inevitably
you're going to see some type of packet screening or price increases
for the privilege of hosing that line.
Once ISDN and ATM become ubiquitous, we won't have to worry about
these things.. :)
-Andrew
`''' Andrew "Fuz" Lih Columbia University
c @@ lih@cs.columbia.edu Mobile Computing Laboratory
\
- (PCMCIA: People Can't Memorize Computer Industry Acronyms)