Re: CU-SeeMe Activity Utility

Michael Sattler, San Francisco (
Mon, 3 Oct 1994 13:40:34 -0400

At 05:36 10/3/94, John S. Erickson wrote:
>This has been a concern of ours at IML, in particular since our network (at
>present) $uck$ up here. So our policy is to not have a "public" reflector ---
>when people wish to do REAL (tm) Work, we release our IP address to them and
>trust that they will not post it in a list. If we find it posted, we'll have
>to monitor usage and see what happens...

I believe this is overkill. Use a non-zero conference number for that Real
Work (tm) and zero for the lurkers.

_/ Michael Sattler <> Don't try to teach _/
_/ FTP Software, West Coast Operations a pig to sing; _/
_/ Quality Assurance Manager it's a waste of time _/
_/ and it annoys the pig. _/