Re: Freeware vs. Whitepine ?

D. A. Barry (barry@cwr.uwa.edu.au)
Thu, 24 Oct 1996 21:26:21 +0800 (WST)


One other thing about the White Pine version of CU-Seeme is that it
allows much higher compression than the PD version. This is likely to be
a factor for most users who rely on modems to access the net.

Andrew Barry

On Thu, 24 Oct 1996, Jacqueline Chados wrote:

>
> I also forgot to mention that WP overwrites your Cornell cuseeme.ini
> which is a real pain in an unpleasant place. It's beyond me why the WP
> isn't a bit more considerate about that.
>
> Regards,
> Jackie
>
> On Tue, 22 Oct 1996, Mark L. Bardenwerper wrote:
>
> > Jacqueline Chados wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 17 Oct 1996, Jesus Arango wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is whitepine much better than the freeware version of CU-SeeMe?
> > > > What features does it have?
> > > > How much does it cost?
> > > > Is much better so it is worth it buying it?
> > >
> > > It does color. It has a better "phonebook". It is noticeably less stable
> > > on my system. It crashes when I try to send sound. The WP people don't
> > > respond to my emails. It costs money. You decide.
>