Re: Netscape....Conference?

Gary Dietz (
Sat, 18 Oct 1997 12:22:20 -0400

At 08:31 PM 10/17/97 -0400, oreoboy wrote:
>> On Fri, 10 Oct 1997, Rolf Hemmerling wrote:
>> > So M$Netmeeting and I$ H323 clients are really garbage by
>> > construction...
>> Garbage by construction? For simply not providing a multipoint
>> conferencing solution? I don't think so. Microsoft has the advantage at
>> this point in that their software is free. I$? I assume that's Intel?
>> Keep in mind that a lot of people who get into videoconferencing do it to
>> keep in touch with relatives. A husband who contacts his wife thru video
>> conferencing or a parent connecting with their kid has no need for
>> multipoint conferencing. There's no requirement in their situations that
>> demand that videoconferencing meet the same expectations that a group in
>> real life might have. In that sense, point to point conferencing is all
>> they ne
>Is anyone using Netscape Conference or Host On Demand?

I've tried Netscape Conference. I haven't much to say about it.

Host on demand? Ha! Try White Pine's WebTerm and WebTerm X! (See


/\/\ Gary Dietz  White Pine Software, Inc./\/\/\/\/\/\
     Product Manager, Vertical Solutions       
     542 Amherst Street, Nashua, NH 03063    (alternate
     603-886-9050 x356