TESTING CUSM

Andre Fleurant (fleura@prestoweb.ca)
Mon, 08 Sep 1997 09:09:36 -0400


Bonjour,
For the last couple of months I have been playing around with CU-SeeMe.

I have 2 versions:
Cornell's 0.92b2
WhitePine demo 2.1.2

I have been running them both on
PC 486-66 32RAM 33,6modem
Pentium 133mhz 32 RAM 28,8 modem

On both systems I use Connectix's QuickCam (b/w)

When getting on reflectors, there is not much that I see is being done
other than video and chatboarding. I have never been able to hold a decent
audio session with any of the two systems.

I might (and must) be doing something wrong.

I would expect CUSM to permit the use of videoconoferencing for the prupose
of training with a maximum of 5 participants, making use of the White
Board. I understand that this option does not exist in Cornell's.

I would also be highly satisfied to be able to hold a point-to-point
session making use of the whiteboard, the audio, and the video. Audio is
more important to me than video, but video must remain active.

QUESTIONS:

Q1.
Are the CUSM's developed enough to be used for good videoconferencing?

Q2.
Up to what number of participant is the multicasting option of WP effective
enough to not request the installation of a reflector?

Q3.
Would somone be available to conduct a test session with me?
Just let me know your availability.

Merci beaucoup,

Andr=E9 Fleurant

PrestoWeb
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
fleura@PrestoWeb.ca T=E9l: 514-656-2193 Fax: 514-656-3532
LE CYBERMARCHE DE L'ASSURANCE http://www.prestoweb.ca/assurance/
C.P. 50533, Brossard, Qc, Canada, J4X 2V7
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D